I've got a few...
Several people posted on here (via copy and paste) of when George himself shut off their e-mail attempts to him came bouncing back with a message several years ago. We all (yes, "we", including myself) received a message back stating something to the effect of (I admit I’m not going to dig around and try to find the exact words) that our e-mails would no longer be accepted by him. Other people contacted him via ebay messages and got a response from him then. This is inexcusable in my opinion, due to thinking that if George was cutting off contact, why didn't he do that for the ebay accounts as well?
I do not have an ebay account but had a third party contact George about him doing that to me. I was informed by that third party that I was to mail George a letter to communicate with him that way. Due to George knowing very well in a past post that I have chronic fatigue and take literally a dozen naps a day, I found that to be abusive, insulting and ridiculous to have to snail mail him a letter. Granted, I'll admit it's only a few extra steps to print a letter, address and send it on its way, but you try having to do the most basic of things during your day in between taking all those naps and they add up, not to mention, again, I feel it's ridiculous (not to mention unprofessional for someone who needs communication for his business) in the first place.
I figured my last step was to file a Better Business Bureau complaint against him, stating to reopen online ways of communicating, which included checking for facts for any FURY-related wiki articles and to send me my remainder of Vectorbolt magazines (I only received the very first one years ago). After all, George responded to people after he blocked them and they tried again via ebay messages, so I figured this would work.
Instead, this resulted in many public defamatory lies about myself created from George when he responded. One was saying about how I was an "unreasonable customer" (an exact quote which anyone can look up on the BBB web site), which I wonder how that is when he was made known in writing of my illness, yet I’m supposed to take extra unnecessary steps (along with, again, many others that were informed their e-mails would not be accepted, nor responded to, although those were in regards to Warrior, which I didn’t order) that will add more time that I do not have as it is (but how "reasonable" IS it to be a business and you ban people from e-mailing you? And yes, I realize this technically isn't defamation since it's an opinion, but I've got more). Another lie was that I "...will not be satisfied with anything", which I have several years' legal experience and anything I do in writing (and sometimes orally as well) I consider it to be a legal action, which I am not going to lie in writing. I stated what needed to be done to fix this matter and I can take – and I can guarantee I will also pass – a polygraph test stating that if George would have agreed to what I asked and followed through then that would have been acceptable. George has no proof whatsoever that I would dare, with my past legal experience, put something public in writing that I would have no basis of following through with (the only exception is that I threatened legal action, but without being able to work with chronic fatigue I have not had the money to employ an attorney for this matter for the last few years...but now I do. I'll probably be seeing my consumer affairs attorney in the next few weeks), as that would be Breach of Contract, which I'm not about to do, nor does, again, George have any proof of that.
He also stated (another exact quote) "It Is obvious to us that this unreasonable customer (arguably that’s defamation even if it's not in the legal sense) will not be satisfied with anything."; how is this "obvious" when he has no proof and I’ll pass a polygraph on this? (Yes I know, a polygraph isn't scientific proof or anything, but if you had the knowledge that would cause a murderer to be convicted rather than go free if you had the evidence, wouldn't you bring that knowledge forward rather than allowing them to stay on the streets?) Since when did he come to this defamatory conclusion by trying to do what I stated would fix this matter and I didn't follow through like I said? Oh that's right, he never did, unless he opened up my being able to e-mail him and he never informed me about it. That won't look good in court, along with everything else.
Another lie is that George stated (another exact quote) "Our only choice Is to refund him for the remaining portion of his subscription and terminate any future dealings with him." One, he had stated for years and years on his web site that he would issue NO REFUNDS for products. It doesn't matter that he would end up canceling and refunding several peoples' orders for Warrior (and I think other products since); contradicting what he stated (for years) in writing won’t look good in court, even though that would be for the best interest in customers (in my and many others’ opinion for getting their refunds). Second (and hence the lie, or one of them), how is this the "only" choice when I stated in writing what would correct this mess that George himself started by refusing my e-mails, then didn’t do as I suggested? That lie would also be furthered when he sent another copy of Vectorbolt to me via certified mail, which I didn’t ask for him to do. This caused further problems since I had to contact USPS in regards to signing for it and when I'd be home, making things even more difficult in my daily life as it is to deliver it upon signature only. They gave us three delivery chances in all for it to be brought here and signed for.
A few days later during the time period when the magazine was supposed to arrive, my mom was expecting a long-time friend to come by and drop off pet supplies (left over from when her dog died, if I remember correctly). At one point one of us went out front and found the bag of supplies there. We then discovered our doorbell wasn't working any more, which the family friend just left the supplies at the door. That got replaced not long afterwards and I e-mailed USPS to tell them to bang on the door real loudly and it should be answered and the magazine accepted. This didn't happen unless it was when I was in the bathroom (which I can't hear the doorbell that far down the hall) or something and mom was elsewhere (who has pretty good hearing) at the time (my dad's hearing was garbage, so he didn't count and has since passed on). They were usually delivering the mail at around noon at that time, so this could be anticipated, so I was taking naps in here (not far from the door). After requesting a third time to deliver the magazine I got an e-mail reply from USPS stating they had tried three times to deliver it and it was going back to George. I don't know how George said that was the "only" option and then he sent it anyway (again, contradicting himself when he said he was terminating all dealings with me, so why'd he try sending another Vectorbolt issue?), even though I never received it, nor the other issues. (Lemme guess, in order to do this I'll have to snail mail him. Like I said, forget it.)
And finally, in regards to the wiki, George lied again with his exact quote of "We have no such obligation to this customer." That is a total lie instigated by George himself and I have several, further pieces of proof of that in writing by, AGAIN, George himself contradicting that.
This all started when he didn’t agree with part of a review I wrote on one of which games that I didn't know the back story to, which he wanted me to start sending him articles first to clarify details/correct any errors before putting them up. Even though he wasn't signed in with his Wikia (now Fandom) account, he would have to explain how the IP address to his comment still states to this day that it, by some incredible coincidence, is still from the same city in California where he lives (or lived, in case he moved since). He would also have to explain all the e-mails from him afterwards (that I still have) where we went back and forth on various details and how he did NOT breach his own contract years later now which, yes, he very definitely did. Like the saying goes, a six year old can write the best legal contracts, and that's what this was: George stated for me to send him info first, there was no expiration date, he made no mention of changing and/or being able to cancel that at will, etc. He will have to cough up this information which does not exist. That is Breach of Contract. It is not like he made some lengthy contract full of big words that, once you get past them, you find that they have a ton of loopholes in them and all (which I'll admit some slimy lawyers do). This was nothing of the sort, it was as simple as possible: send me the articles first and I'll respond. He gave no information whatsoever as to when he could terminate that contract at will.
(Oh, lemme guess, George didn’t "lie" in regards to this, he just "forgot". Sorry, but it makes no difference how you look at it, him saying he has "no such obligation to this customer" over the wiki is
false by his own doing in creating that contract himself that he never modified. This is false, a lie, him remembering differently, however you look at it,
period.)
Now, depending on what the statutes of limitations say for this nonsense, I could be out of luck for most of the above since this was a few years ago (most states have one to three year statutes for small claims court, which is what this probably falls under as far as jurisdiction and definition). Since the BBB reports are up for seven years though, those statutes might not even start until the 1-3 years are up once that complaint with George's lies disappears after those seven years have expired. However, since he never changed the contract as far as the wiki goes (which, again, he has no proof of this since it never happened, along with him never promising any kind of termination, nor changes to it either), those statutes have never started and never will. So I can still, to the best of my knowledge, pursue legal action for that, if nothing else. Just a few phone calls to secure another attorney would do it (in case my consumer affairs attorney won’t take the case).
In conclusion, I would say all of the aforementioned is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, but then, most of that can be easily confirmed on the BBB web site with the complaint. Can't say George can claim the same with the disgusting things he said about me, which he has no proof of and will never be able to prove. I've got my proof against George on the wiki with his comment, the IP address suspiciously matches his city at the time (and possibly still now years later), and even more suspicious e-mails following all that up...none from George saying he revoked, changed, nor canceled his own contract in any shape or form, which he also did not state he could do at any time either when he first proposed it.
Also, how'd I do all of the above with chronic fatigue? Simple: I typed this up years ago in between naps and/or at the end of the day when my naps were done with. Same goes with the Vector Wars, I play games either in between naps or at the end of the day when they're finished. Plus typing over 80 wpm helps.
