Post by VectorX on Feb 4, 2013 21:57:20 GMT -5
I'll admit this isn't the most gripping name for a game, but it fits.
Funny, my mom had said a few weeks ago when she downloaded the app it was an enormously pointless game.
Then she started getting to the harder levels and shut up from there ;D Kind of like what she said with Jewel Mania, but then a couple of months later we're still playing that one.
What the deal is, you have some kind of creature to take care of called that is named Om Nom. All it does is sit while you have to cut one or more ropes containing a treat in order for the treat fly towards Om Nom so you can feed it. It will just open its mouth to eat the candy, or look disappointed when you screw up and miss, which will happen, due to there being many ropes at times and you cut the wrong one, then look at it another way and go "oh, I should have cut ___ rope instead". All levels can be restarted an infinite number of times (I think) until you pass them.
Spiders start appearing that will swipe the candy if you let them, along with bubbles that can carry it off, or maybe help you feed Om Nom, along with spikes that will pop other stuff to hinder you with if you're not careful.
The is a good game, but puzzle games like this start seeming the same to me. I'll give this a 6.5 out of 10 for the iOS version, but that's only from playing a couple of dozen levels for free, then you have to pay for more. Maybe they get better, but it got a bit tiring at the end for me. And TrekMD on here said he put it up alongside Angry Birds, so he might have more to say there
At least Om Nom's sort of like Stitch from the Lilo and Stitch movies, mostly being all mouth, although he's green instead of blue and more appealing (especially since Stitch was an intergalactic fugitive), plus with the iPad version (I don't know about the Android or possibly other versions), several videos come with the app download, which are pretty funny for the most part and have had tens of millions of views on YouTube, as I had posted about this weeks ago elsewhere (which I meant to do this review as well back then).
Funny, my mom had said a few weeks ago when she downloaded the app it was an enormously pointless game.
Then she started getting to the harder levels and shut up from there ;D Kind of like what she said with Jewel Mania, but then a couple of months later we're still playing that one.
What the deal is, you have some kind of creature to take care of called that is named Om Nom. All it does is sit while you have to cut one or more ropes containing a treat in order for the treat fly towards Om Nom so you can feed it. It will just open its mouth to eat the candy, or look disappointed when you screw up and miss, which will happen, due to there being many ropes at times and you cut the wrong one, then look at it another way and go "oh, I should have cut ___ rope instead". All levels can be restarted an infinite number of times (I think) until you pass them.
Spiders start appearing that will swipe the candy if you let them, along with bubbles that can carry it off, or maybe help you feed Om Nom, along with spikes that will pop other stuff to hinder you with if you're not careful.
The is a good game, but puzzle games like this start seeming the same to me. I'll give this a 6.5 out of 10 for the iOS version, but that's only from playing a couple of dozen levels for free, then you have to pay for more. Maybe they get better, but it got a bit tiring at the end for me. And TrekMD on here said he put it up alongside Angry Birds, so he might have more to say there
At least Om Nom's sort of like Stitch from the Lilo and Stitch movies, mostly being all mouth, although he's green instead of blue and more appealing (especially since Stitch was an intergalactic fugitive), plus with the iPad version (I don't know about the Android or possibly other versions), several videos come with the app download, which are pretty funny for the most part and have had tens of millions of views on YouTube, as I had posted about this weeks ago elsewhere (which I meant to do this review as well back then).